Fate vs Free will- Blog Post #3
A
paper from 20 years ago stated that free will does not exist. Your thoughts do
nothing to produce an action. This paper (written by Dan Wegner and
Thalia Wheatley) stated that we have no choice on what we do. This is the case
in Never let me go. The main
characters have no choice in what happened. Their life is planned for them.
Choice is simply an illusion and I, to an extent agree.
Another study, (documented here https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/mind-guest-blog/what-neuroscience-says-about-free-will/ )
came to the same conclusions. We don’t choose what we do. There is no free will
in majority of our actions. Within the
novel, the same concept appears, on a greater scale. The main characters
“donate their organs” however they have no choice which tends to reflect on our
day to day life.
There is a concept where you can
feel a phantom touch on your arm before someone actually touches you. The idea
behind this is reality is behind time. This is an interesting idea which I personally
believe. The idea has the same effect as fate vs free will. Technically there
is no free will if everything has already happened in the “past”. This
principal of a delay in reality explains that actions are already predetermined
and we fool ourselves by think we chose them. Everything, both in Never let me
go, and reality is an action of fate, and none of our thoughts can change this.
I like how you deal with the problem that you had with the articles
ReplyDelete